Grade Control Open Pit Sampling Procedure

The procedure for grade control open pit sampling is a systematic workflow of planned sample collection, geological logging, preparation, assay, and data integration used to define ore and waste boundaries on a daily to weekly basis. It begins with a blast hole sampling program, where drill cuttings from production blastholes are collected and assayed to map grade distribution within the blast block, and is supplemented by reverse circulation (RC) drilling for grade control where needed.

Purpose and Background of Grade Control Sampling

Grade control sampling exists to bridge the gap between the resource model and the actual ore delivered to the mill. Resource models are based on widely spaced exploration drill holes (often 20–50 m), but mining needs to know what to send to the crusher and what to send to the waste dump on a much finer scale. Blasthole sampling provides that fine-scale data because blastholes are typically spaced 2–5 m apart and are drilled in every blast pattern, giving near-complete coverage of the bench. The goal is to maximize the value of the orebody by minimizing dilution (waste mixed with ore) and ore loss (ore sent to waste).

In most open pit operations, grade control is a continuous cycle: the mine plan defines a blast block, the block is drilled and blasted, samples are taken from the blasthole cuttings, and the resulting assay data is used to draw ore/waste polygons for the loader operators. This process is repeated for every bench, and the data also feeds back into the resource model to improve its accuracy over time.

Key Steps in the Procedure

The procedure can be broken down into a series of steps that are followed for each blast block:

1. Blast design and drilling: The mine plan specifies the blast pattern, and production drills create holes of a known diameter (usually 150–250 mm) and depth (bench height plus sub-drill). The drill cuttings are collected at the hole collar.
2. Sample collection: A representative sample of cuttings is taken from each hole. This is usually done by a rig-mounted cyclone or a hand-held splitter that captures a portion of the cuttings as they are blown out of the hole. The sample is placed in a pre-labeled bag with the hole ID and depth.
3. Geological logging: A geologist or trained technician logs each sample for rock type, alteration, mineralization, and any visual features. This is done at the rig or at a central logging area.
4. Sample preparation: Samples are dried, crushed, and split to produce a pulverized sub-sample for assay. The preparation must follow strict protocols to avoid contamination and ensure the sample represents the original cuttings.
5. Assaying: The pulverized sample is analyzed for the target elements (e.g., gold, copper, iron). Common methods include fire assay for gold, ICP for multi-element analysis, and XRF for fast field-based results.
6. Data integration and modeling: Assay results are entered into a database, validated, and then used to create a grade model of the blast block. Geostatistical methods such as kriging or inverse distance weighting are often used to interpolate grades between holes.
7. Polygon definition and dispatch: The grade model is used to draw ore and waste polygons on the bench map. These polygons are loaded into the mine’s dispatch system, which guides the shovel operators on where to dig and which trucks to load.

Blasthole Sampling Methods and Equipment

The most common method is collecting cuttings from the air-cyclone system on the drill rig. The cyclone separates the rock dust from the air stream, and a sample splitter (e.g., a riffle splitter or a rotary splitter) takes a representative portion. The sample size is typically 2–5 kg, depending on the particle size and the required assay precision. For coarse gold deposits, a larger sample (e.g., 10 kg) may be needed to reduce the nugget effect.

An alternative is reverse circulation (RC) drilling, which is used when blasthole samples are not reliable due to wet ground, contamination, or the need for deeper sampling. RC drilling produces a cleaner sample because the cuttings are transported through the center of the drill pipe, reducing contamination from the hole walls. However, RC is more expensive and slower than blasthole sampling, so it is used only where necessary.

Another method is chip sampling from the bench face or from blast muck piles, but this is less common because it is labor-intensive and less accurate. It is sometimes used for verification or when blasthole samples are lost.

Sampling Density and Pattern Design

The spacing of blastholes is determined by the blast design, which is based on the rock properties and the required fragmentation. For grade control, the spacing is often 3 m × 3 m to 6 m × 6 m. The closer the spacing, the better the grade resolution, but also the higher the drilling cost. A common compromise is to drill a regular grid with occasional infill holes in areas of high grade variability.

The sample depth is typically the full bench height (e.g., 10 m), but some operations take separate samples from the top and bottom half of the hole to capture vertical grade variation. This is especially useful when the orebody dips or when there is a distinct ore/waste contact within the bench.

Sample Preparation and Assay Quality Control

Sample preparation must be done in a facility that follows standard protocols (e.g., ISO 17025 or equivalent). The key steps are: drying, crushing to <2 mm, splitting to a smaller mass, and pulverizing to <75 µm. The final pulp is then assayed. Quality control is critical: blank samples (to check for contamination), certified reference materials (to check accuracy), and duplicate samples (to check precision) must be inserted at a rate of about 5% each. If the QC fails, the batch is re-assayed.

Assay methods vary by element and grade. For gold, fire assay with atomic absorption or ICP finish is the standard. For base metals, ICP-OES or ICP-MS is common. Portable XRF can be used for real-time field analysis, but it is less accurate than lab methods, so it is often used for screening or for elements like copper where the precision is acceptable.

Data Modeling and Ore/Waste Definition

Once assays are in the database, the data is validated (e.g., checking for duplicate hole IDs, missing depths, and extreme values). Then a block model is created for the blast block, typically using a cell size of 2–5 m. The grades are interpolated using kriging or inverse distance weighting, with the blasthole samples as the primary data. The model is then used to classify each block as ore or waste based on the cut-off grade, which is the grade at which the revenue from the ore equals the cost of mining and processing.

The ore/waste polygons are generated by outlining the ore blocks on the bench plan. These polygons are then exported to the mine’s dispatch system, which uses GPS to guide the shovel operators. The polygons must be updated as new blasts are mined, and the actual mined grades are reconciled with the predicted grades to measure the accuracy of the grade control process.

Common Problems and How to Avoid Them

One common problem is sample contamination, which can occur when the drill rig moves from one hole to another and cuttings from the previous hole are not fully cleaned. This is avoided by cleaning the cyclone and splitter between holes, and by using a separate sample for the first few meters of each hole (often discarded). Another issue is wet ground, which can cause the cuttings to stick together and clog the splitter, leading to a biased sample. In such cases, the drilling may be paused until the ground dries, or an alternate sampling method (e.g., RC) is used.

Another challenge is the nugget effect, where the grade of a sample is dominated by a few coarse particles of high-grade mineralization. This is common in gold deposits. The effect can be reduced by taking larger samples, using a more rigorous sample preparation (e.g., screening to remove coarse particles), or using a different assay method (e.g., screen fire assay).

Finally, data entry errors are a constant risk. Using barcoded sample bags and automated data capture from the assay lab can reduce these errors.

Costs and Alternatives

The cost of grade control sampling is mainly the drilling cost (if RC is used) and the assay cost. Blasthole sampling is relatively cheap because the drilling is already done for blasting, and the assay cost is typically $10–$30 per sample. For a typical blast block of 100 holes, the assay cost is $1,000–$3,000, which is a small fraction of the value of the ore. RC drilling, on the other hand, can cost $20–$50 per meter, so it is used sparingly.

Alternatives to blasthole sampling include in-pit grade control using portable XRF, which can give real-time results but with lower accuracy. Another alternative is using the resource model alone, without additional sampling, but this leads to higher dilution and ore loss. More advanced methods, such as using blast movement monitors to track ore movement during blasting, are also used to improve the accuracy of the polygons.

Safety and Environmental Considerations

Safety is paramount in grade control sampling. Workers are often near moving equipment and drilling rigs, so they must wear high-visibility clothing, hard hats, and safety glasses. Dust from the drill cuttings can be hazardous, so dust suppression systems (e.g., water sprays) are used. When collecting samples from the cyclone, workers must be careful not to touch the hot cuttings or get them in their eyes. Also, the sample bags should be sealed properly to prevent spillage.

Environmental concerns include dust generation and potential contamination of soil and water. Dust suppression and proper disposal of drill cuttings are standard practices. In some jurisdictions, the drill cuttings may need to be tested for hazardous materials before disposal.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between blasthole sampling and RC drilling for grade control?

Blasthole sampling uses the cuttings from production blasts, which are collected from the drill rig’s cyclone. It is cheap and covers the entire blast block, but the samples can be contaminated by the drill bit and the hole walls. RC drilling uses a dedicated drill rig that produces cleaner samples from deeper or wetter ground, but it is more expensive and slower, so it is used only where blasthole samples are not reliable.

How often should grade control samples be taken?

Every blast block should be sampled. The frequency is determined by the mining schedule, but typically each blast bench is sampled before blasting. In a busy mine, that could mean several blasts per week, each with 50–200 samples. The exact number depends on the blast size and the sampling pattern.

What is the cut-off grade and how is it used?

The cut-off grade is the minimum grade that a block must have to be economically mined as ore. It is calculated from the metal price, mining cost, processing cost, and recovery. Blocks above the cut-off are sent to the mill, and blocks below are sent to the waste dump. The cut-off can change over time as costs and prices change.

Can portable XRF replace lab assays for grade control?

Portable XRF can be used for real-time field analysis, but it is generally less accurate than lab assays, especially for low-grade samples and for elements like gold that require a larger sample. It is useful for screening and for elements like copper, but for final ore/waste decisions, lab assays are still the standard.

What is the nugget effect and how does it affect sampling?

The nugget effect is the high variability in grade caused by the presence of a few coarse particles of high-grade mineralization. It can cause a single sample to be unrepresentative of the surrounding rock. To reduce its impact, larger samples are taken, and special assay methods like screen fire assay are used to analyze the coarse fraction separately.

Grade Control Sampling Template

For specific legal, tax, or financial aspects of mining operations, consult a qualified professional.

Related

• Field Engineering Change Control Procedure
• Document and Data Control Procedure Explained
• Document and Record Control Procedure: How It Works